A mother has been in a legal battle with the Road Accident Fund (RAF), claiming damages.
Tatiana Akhmedova has won another battle in the long-running divorce saga against her ex-husband and son.
Jane Bwanya has approached the Constitutional Court to change laws that don’t allow people in opposite-sex life partnerships the same inheritance rights as married couples.
A groundbreaking judgement from the Western Cape High Court has taken the first step toward addressing the legacy of apartheid spatial planning in Cape Town.
The Western Cape High Court has granted an urgent interdict stopping the City from evicting people who illegally occupied land during the lockdown.
The South African government is facing a number of legal challenges at present, set to play out in courtrooms across the country.
A new High Court ruling could have a major positive impact on the rights of domestic workers in South Africa.
The High Court in Pretoria has just ruled that Shaun Abrahams must be removed from his post as National Director, and Zuma isn’t going to like that.
Although we can be sure that this will have hardly any impact on Zuma’s current presidential status, the long-term effects could be damning.
After the Sudanese President was allowed to leave our shores, despite a high court order ruling that he be detained, the South African government came under fire. Here’s their defence.
In what many will claim is a victory for free speech a massive Constitutional Court ruling has gone the way of the DA. Next up…pay back the money!
South African legal history was made in the Durban High Court yesterday when Judge Esther Steyn agreed to allow the service of a legal notice on a man being sued to be posted on his Facebook page.
In what has been deemed a landmark case starting today in the North Gauteng High Court, 13 advocates face being struck off the roll for allegedly sucking the Road Accident Fund dry through dodgy billing practices.
Huh. Well this just opens up a whole can of worms, doesn’t it? Sexy, mentally handicapped worms. A High Court judge ruled that ‘Alan,’ who’d been in a relationship with another fellow, lacks “the capacity to consent to and engage in sexual relations.” Choose your own punchline – there are so many.