[imagesource:facebook/michaelmoore]
In a surprising twist to the sordid saga that was Jeffrey Epstein’s life, a court in Florida has ordered the publication of graphic transcripts from the state’s 2006 case against the billionaire paedophile, which resulted in the filthy financier receiving what amounted to a judicial slap on the wrist.
Epstein cut a deal with authorities in 2008 to avoid charges of sex trafficking and rape, pleading guilty to a lesser charge and eventually only receiving a 13-month prison sentence.
Yesterday, Judge Luis Delgado ordered that the nearly 200 pages of documents which contain details of Epstein’s crimes, including first-hand accounts from victims and specifics about payoffs to underage victims, be released to the public.
Handing down the judgement, the judge said “details in the record will be outrageous to decent people”.
“The testimony taken by the Grand Jury concerns activity ranging from grossly unacceptable to rape — all of the conduct at issue is sexually deviant, disgusting, and criminal.”
The judge rightly pointed to the absurd leniency shown to Epstein, saying that the case had “been the subject of much anger and has at times diminished the public’s perception of the criminal justice system”.
Releasing the documents will shed some light on why “the most infamous paedophile in American history” got off so light.
“Epstein is indeed notorious and infamous and is widely reported to have flaunted his wealth while cavorting with politicians, billionaires, and even British Royalty.”
“It is understandable that given those reports the public has a great curiosity about what was widely reported by news agencies as ‘special treatment’ regarding his prosecution.”
Before being convicted in 2008 for ‘soliciting prostitution from a minor’, Epstein had been a well-known figure among the world’s most powerful people and regularly cavorted with the likes of Bill Clinton, Donald Trump and even the monarchy’s black sheep, Prince Andrew.
Many of the individuals in the case had been described anonymously as “John Does” or “Jane Does”, but now most of their real names have been released.
The dirty laundry list of Epstein’s pals has been circulating for a while, but the newly released documents will keep questions about their involvement in his sick deeds alive – much to the dismay of people like Prince Andrew, who still has some awkward questions to answer about his relationship with Epstein and his circle.
The court papers include the testimony of Johanna Sjoberg who describes meeting Prince Andrew at Epstein’s home in New York in 2001, along with Epstein’s associate Ghislaine Maxwell and Virginia Giuffre, who went on to make and settle a civil sex assault claim against Prince Andrew.
Ms Sjoberg’s statement, which had previously been partly revealed, describes an encounter in which she claims Prince Andrew touched her breast. Then aged 20, she was at college when she was recruited by Maxwell, initially, she believed as an assistant before finding that she was encouraged to deliver sexual massages for Epstein, which she resisted.
The documents also detail how another victim, Virginia Giuffre (then called Roberts) was too young to get into a casino, to which Epstein responded “We’ll call up Trump and we’ll go to the casino”.
The released documents also carry the claims by Giuffre that she had been directed to have sex with Prince Andrew – claims denied in Ghislaine Maxwell’s testimony. Prince Andrew has rejected any wrongdoing, including in his later settlement with Giuffre in 2022.
Although Buckingham Palace has declared that Prince Andrew “deplores the exploitation of any human being and the suggestion he would condone, participate in or encourage any such behaviour is abhorrent”, the Prince has lost his royal titles and ended his official duties as a result of the fall out from the case.
Epstein’s suicide might have been very convenient for several powerful people, but small court victories like these ensure that those who think they ‘got away with it’ continue to be hounded. You can’t cavort in the mud and then claim to be clean afterwards.
On a lighter note, spare a thought for this poor sucker who still has to defend his name.
I guess I should appreciate all the RIPs, but I’m not dead. And I’m still *not* THAT Jeffrey Epstein.
— Jeffrey R Epstein (@EpsteinJeffrey) August 10, 2019
[source:bbc]
[imagesource: Cindy Lee Director/Facebook] A compelling South African short film, The L...
[imagesource: Instagram/cafecaprice] Is it just me or has Summer been taking its sweet ...
[imagesource:wikimedia] After five years of work and millions in donations, The Notre-D...
[imagesource:worldlicenseplates.com] What sounds like a James Bond movie is becoming a ...
[imagesource:supplied] As the festive season approaches, it's time to deck the halls, g...