[imagesource:wellingtonorbit]
Alex Garland’s films have never shied away from depicting threats to humanity. From 2002’s surprisingly brilliant pandemic movie 28 Days Later to the uncontrollable artificial intelligence of 2014’s Ex Machina, Garland seems to have a knack for tapping into the zeitgeist.
But the filmmaker reckons his movies are less about playing to our fears, than merely reporting on what is right in front of us. He’s dealing, he says, with “omnipresent realities that demand no great leaps of vision”.
Considering the subject matter in his new film Civil War, these words are ominous, to say the least.
Garland wrote Civil War in 2020, when societies around the world were unravelling over COVID-19 and the prospect of societal breakdown was on everyone’s minds.
“That was pretty deafening back then,” Garland says. “So in a way, it’s slightly past zeitgeist. It’s actually oppressive.”
Civil War is an attempt to turn widely held American anxieties into a violent, unsettling big-screen reality. Garland’s film opens today (Friday) — the anniversary of the day the US Civil War began in 1861 – and it’s landing in movie theatres just months ahead of a momentous presidential election, making it Hollywood’s most explosive movie of the year.
For months now the trailers for Civil War have drummed up the intrigue. But Civil War is more than its matter-of-fact title might allude to. The film, which Garland wrote and directed, isn’t aimed directly at today’s polarised America.
While war ravages the country, California and Texas join forces against a fascist president (Nick Offerman) who’s seized a third term and disbanded the FBI, while a band of journalists (Kirsten Dunst, Cailee Spaeny, Wagner Moura) makes its way toward Washington, D.C. amidst the chaos.
Much of the film’s disquiet comes from seeing visceral encounters of war — bombings, firefights and executions — on contemporary American soil. Civil War was mostly shot in Georgia. For Americans who have in recent years wondered “How bad can it get?” — a concern some polls have shown is as much as 40% of the population — the movie is a sobering answer.
“When things collapse, the speed at which they collapse tends to surprise people — including people like intelligence officers whose job is to watch and predict when these things will happen,” Garland said in a recent interview.
The rapidity with which society can disintegrate has long fascinated the 53-year-old British-born filmmaker who burst onto Hollywood’s radar with the screenplay for the zombie apocalypse thriller 28 Days Later. Western democracies, he says, can lean too much on their sense of exceptionalism.
Civil War isn’t an act of cynicism. It’s a warning shot. Things are always in a slightly more dangerous state than they might appear.
In previous election seasons, Hollywood has attempted to express, reflect, or capitalise on political turmoil. Ahead of the 2020 election, Universal Pictures and Blumhouse Productions published The Hunt, in which leftists kidnap “rednecks” and “deplorables” to hunt on a private preserve.
The film was postponed when it received right-wing criticism (then-President Trump claimed it was “made in order to inflame and cause chaos”). When The Hunt eventually hit theatres in March 2020, it was a ‘more equal mockery’ of the left and right than some had feared.
While some critics have questioned the appropriateness of the timing for Civil War, there are however few direct allusions to the political fissures in America today. Joining Texas and California together removes any “blue state” vs. “red state” themes, and neither race nor income inequality appear to be issues of division. The president’s political party is also unspecified.
Civil War instead plays out with more subtle references to today’s politics and cultural splits. For instance, Jesse Plemons plays a heinous militant who interrogates the main characters, asking them: “What kind of American are you?”
“Yes, it was a delicate balance,” Garland says. “We thought about it, we discussed it, we talked about what was appropriate. Look, the plan is to make a compelling and engaging film, and the product of the compelling and engaging film is a conversation. So the questions are: How do you make sure that you’re not dismantling a conversation in the first part of that equation?”
Civil War, which cost R936 million to make, is the largest budgeted film yet from indie studio A24.
“A lot of the boldness is not actually mine,” says Garland. “I think it belongs to A24. You would find there are always people attempting to make these films. The question is whether they’ve been given the support to make them.”
Civil War is just a possibility, the director stresses, not a prediction. I guess we’ll have to wait and see.
[source:ap]
[imagesource: Sararat Rangsiwuthaporn] A woman in Thailand, dubbed 'Am Cyanide' by Thai...
[imagesource:renemagritte.org] A René Magritte painting portraying an eerily lighted s...
[imagesource: Alison Botha] Gqeberha rape survivor Alison Botha, a beacon of resilience...
[imagesource:mcqp/facebook] Clutch your pearls for South Africa’s favourite LGBTQIA+ ce...
[imagesource:capetown.gov] The City of Cape Town’s Mayoral Committee has approved the...