I love a good generalisation, so when I saw a Julius Malema piece titled ‘Why do white people despise blacks’ I was immediately won over.

Of course given the likes of Penny Sparrow, Justin van Vuuren and Nicole de Klerk (congrats on being hired and fired within a week) we can see where Malema is coming from. It’s probably best that we just give the floor to Julius and pull some excerpts from the Sunday Times:

There is no doubt that the recent social media posts by white supremacists referring to black people as animals and the uneducated, dirty masses are mere symptoms of an entrenched phenomenon of racism.

Anti-black racism has been the order of the day in South Africa and our 22 years of democratic rule have dismally failed to uproot its causes. Why do white people despise blacks? Why is it that they find it easy to look at us with disgust and undermine our humanity?

The answer lies in the structural organisation of black lives, the material conditions that have been made exclusive to black people. What colonisation and apartheid did was to make poverty, hunger, undereducation, landlessness and cheap labour part of the exclusive identity of black people. It did not matter that one black person, or a family, or a group, was educated – maybe even better than whites – as long as the majority of black people lived in conditions of squalor, this remained the identity they shared.

A black revolution should therefore be about the structural transformation of the black condition as a condition of inhumanity. Until such a time, it is futile to expect any white person or white people as a group to respect black people or treat them like human beings…

One only needs to look at how cheap a black life truly is to white people by comparing the fact that 34 black mineworkers are massacred in broad daylight, and white people never even run a petition online.

Although rhinos are poached daily, we do not see poachers poaching them like we did when the police shot and killed the workers. Yet, there is a big campaign and a huge investment in saving the rhino. People have statues of them everywhere, they even organise marathons where they “run to save the rhino”.

This tells you, right here in South Africa, a country with a majority of blacks, that black people are worth less than rhinos.

If you do not buy the rhino story in relation to mineworkers who were massacred by the ANC government in protection of white monopoly investment, then the other example is white people’s pets. Here, you find that the dogs and cats of white people have medical aid, while the black garden and kitchen workers do not and cannot afford it.

He does make a rather valid point there – the fact that we are all still not up in arms about Marikana each and every day is a stain on our society as a whole. Back to Julius:

From recent announcements, even by former president FW de Klerk, we know that they have no remorse about what they have done. It should have been clear when De Klerk took his oath as second deputy president to Nelson Mandela in Afrikaans that he is not apologetic. It was a sign of arrogance shown to the nation that he was not remorseful of white supremacy and its legacy.

What, then, is to be done? Economic freedom is the only answer to the transformation of the condition upon which white supremacy rests; the day black people attain economic freedom, white people will lack the basis to despise us, and the attitude to despise will not affect anyone’s access to a means of subsistence.

Economic freedom means the distribution of land to end congested townships and lead agrarian reform; and nationalisation of mines and banks to fund free, quality education, sanitation and healthcare, to name a few. This will restore the dignity to black people; any project that does not focus on this will only result in cosmetic changes.

It will result merely in silencing whites while they continue to live their lives as white supremacists without interruption.

A pretty well put together argument, although that bit about land redistribution will have many quaking in their boots.

[source:timeslive]