[imagesource:pxhere]
A fight is brewing between residents of Table View and Milnerton and developers hoping to build 337 flats and nine group houses along a stretch of land that is home to the endangered Cape Fynbos.
This week, the City confirmed that approval was granted on ERF 38599 Milnerton for the residential development despite more than 300 objections from residents in the area being lodged.
Local residents are now challenging the City over their decision to proceed with the development despite their objections that the property was home to Cape Fynbos.
Des Palm of the Sunridge Action Group, Table View, questioned why the fynbos had previously been removed. “The issue revolves around a particular piece of land earmarked for high-density development,” said Palm.
“A previous environmental report found Cape Flats Sand Fynbos to have been present on the property. Parties known to us cleared the land of all vegetation thus removing the fynbos.”
IOL reports that the City’s Deputy Mayor and Mayoral Committee Member for Spatial Planning and Environment, Eddie Andrews, told Weekend Argus that they received a mammoth of appeals and objections against the planned 337 flats, nine group houses and 16 Single Residential dwelling houses.
“The applications were approved subject to conditions set by the Municipal Planning Tribunal on 5 July 2022,” Andrews explained. “A number of appeals were received against the decision of the MPT.”
“The Planning Appeals Advisory Panel thoroughly considered the matter and recommended to the Executive Mayor in his capacity as the Final Appeal Authority that the appeals be dismissed.”
“The Executive Mayor considered the matter and after considerate assessment, decided to dismiss the appeals and approve the application.”
When questioned about the concerns made by people regarding Cape Fynbos, he stated that environmental evaluations had been undertaken.
“The application does not trigger any activities listed in terms of the National Environmental Management Act (NEMA),” he clarified.
“In deciding on the application, the impact of the development on the biophysical environment was considered and conditions were imposed to mitigate any possible environmental impact.”
Freshwater Consulting, who specialise in river and wetland consultancy, also shared their concerns over the proposed development.
“Regarding Erf 38599, we are extremely concerned about the manner in which profits seem to take preference over environmental safeguards.”
According to the group, “More than 50% of Erf 38599 shows to be “critically endangered”, with a large portion of the North being a “national wetland”.
Environmental studies classify a critically endangered area as a threatened ecosystem, and common sense classifies 337 flats as a bad idea.
[source:iol]
Hey Guys - thought I’d just give a quick reach-around and say a big thank you to our rea...
[imagesource:CapeRacing] For a unique breakfast experience combining the thrill of hors...
[imagesource:howler] If you're still stumped about what to do to ring in the new year -...
[imagesource:maxandeli/facebook] It's not just in corporate that staff parties get a li...
[imagesource:here] Imagine being born with the weight of your parents’ version of per...