It really is tough to keep up with Jacob Zuma’s legal battles.

As news broke yesterday of another decision, handed down by another court, it was tough to muster much delight.

After all, haven’t we heard this one before. As someone said on Twitter, “It’s so cute and naive how every now and then the courts rule that Zuma should do his job and stick to the law”.

Well, for what it’s worth, this one would have hurt our scumbag leader. The High Court in Pretoria dismissed his legal bid to have Madonsela’s recommendations set aside, and he was also ordered to pay the legal costs of both parties involved from his own pockets.

You know, the pockets lined with our money.

Anyway HuffPost SA broke this down into seven easy to digest nuggets of info, so let’s run through those and get on the same page:

1) In November last year, after Zuma failed to block its contents from being made public, Madonsela’s report was released. It revealed prima facie evidence of the president’s relationship with the controversial Gupta family…

Madonsela recommended, because her office did not have the capacity and her term of office was ending, that Zuma appoint a judicial commission of inquiry to investigate the matter further. But because of Zuma’s conflict of interest in the matter, she said the judge presiding over the investigation should be appointed by the chief justice.

2) Zuma immediately approached the courts, saying the public protector does not have the power to dictate the terms of the commission…

3) Madonsela’s successor, Busisiwe Mkhwebane, took up the fight in court along with opposition parties. On Wednesday, the court ordered in their favour. The court found that Zuma was “ill-advised and reckless” in launching a challenge against the remedial action.

4) Madonsela’s recommendations are now binding –– although Zuma can appeal the court’s decision. But as it stands, the president must now appoint a commission of inquiry into state capture within 30 days, and the judge presiding over the probe will be appointed by Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng.

5) Judge-President Dunstan Mlambo agreed that Zuma has the power alone to appoint commissions, but said this power given to him by the constitution cannot be viewed in isolation of other laws. He also agreed that Madonsela’s powers in terms of her remedial action is dependent on the type of investigation her office undertakes –– and that this case is an exceptional one for obvious reasons.

6) Mlambo found that most of Zuma’s arguments were “groundless” and “without merit”, including one that said Madonsela’s report found no prima facie evidence of his relationship with the Gupta family. The court also applauded Madonsela’s decision to hand over the responsibility of choosing a judge to the chief justice.

7) Zuma will likely take the ruling to the Supreme Court of Appeal, where he will argue that the ruling infringes on his constitutional powers. In that event, the ruling will be delayed until the appeal is heard and a decision made.

In other words, yay, but of course there are more legal battles to be fought.

I think we can at least take solace in the fact that Zuma became the first president of South Africa to be issued with a personal legal cost order.

News24’s Editor-in-Chief Adriaan Basson and Opinions Editor Alet Janse van Rensburg offer some decent insight here, too:

For an excellent read on how JZ will be feeling ahead of the ANC Elective Conference this weekend, pop over to the Daily Maverick HERE.

[sources:huffpostsa&news24]