Emojis, hey.

We have spoken on the topic quite a bit, the last being when we warned you about how you might come across when using them in a professional capacity.

Well, what I am about to tell you stems from that, so it’s high time you start realising that emoticons can get you into a fair amount of trouble.

From a smiley face to a bottle of champers, sending an emoticon that “creates the impression of positivity‚ acceptance or agreement in the mind of the receiver” could have dire consequences.

This is according to Johannes du Plessis‚ legal advisor to insurance and risk specialist Risk Benefit Solutions, reports Times LIVE.

Sending anyone of those seemingly innocent emoticons in either a message or an email could lead you to being “bound by unwanted contracts and held liable for damages”.

Eish.

“Many individuals negotiate lease agreements with landlords or agents‚ or make purchase and sale agreements with sellers they found in newspaper or website classifieds.

“Placing a thumbs up‚ smiley face‚ bottle of champagne‚ dancing figures‚ sunshine‚ rainbow‚ heart‚ or any other emoticon which creates the impression of positivity‚ acceptance or agreement in the mind of the receiver‚ might result in the conclusion of a legal contract.”

Du Plessis explained that this could result in the sender being bound “as if he had the will and intention to enter into the contract”:

“Should you then breach the contract‚ you may become liable to the other party for possible damages.”

And it isn’t just a considerate warning from du Plessis; according to Section 22 of the Electronic Communications and Transactions Act (ECTA), contracts concluded wholly or partly by a data message is valid in law:

Du Plessis added: “If the sender argues that the receiver did not read the acceptance‚ section 23 of the ECTA even provides that the data message (which created the impression of positivity or acceptance) must be regarded as having been received by the receiver‚ and therefore concluded‚ when the complete data message enters the information system used by the receiver and is capable of being retrieved by the receiver.”

And this demonstration of emoticon usage has already come before the courts:

“In one case‚ during lease negotiations‚ an instant message user sent a ‘smiley’‚ a bottle of champagne‚ and dancing figures to a landlord who was advertising a property for rent.

“As a result‚ the landlord removed his on-line advertisement. The court stated that these emoticons conveyed to the landlord that everything was in order‚ and that the message was misleading. The sender was subsequently ordered to compensate the landlord for the landlord’s loss of prospective rental income‚” he said.

Another case saw a court find that an “SMS constituted an acceptance of an offer and as such‚ a valid contract has been concluded”:

“Therefore‚ if you are negotiating an employment contract per SMS or instant message‚ and create the impression of positivity or acceptance‚ you can be held liable for the employer’s loss of revenue if you then breach that contract‚” he said.

“Communicating with the use of emoticons makes it very easy for instant message users to be held liable for damages. The implication of this is clear‚ so do not put yourself at risk by communicating in any way that could create an incorrect impression or belief in the mind of the receiver that a legal contract has been concluded.”

If that doesn’t make you think twice about using emoticons in a professional (and personal) capacity, then I don’t know what will.

[source:timeslive]