Yesterday’s meeting at Parliament was a day waited for with anticipation for anyone who is following the Zuma / Gupta / Cabinet Minister saga. President Jacob Zuma would finally be confronted on the issues regarding the offering of certain positions of power to certain people on the basis that they do something in return to benefit the Guptas.

When opposition leader Mmusi Maimane got to the podium, his stern question was filled with anger, frustration and a hint of desperation, but the answer he received was on the opposite side of those emotions.

My question Mr President: Whether the Gupta family has ever offered anybody a Cabinet position in your term of office as president or is Minister Jonas in fact lying because if in fact he is or he is not, is the president willing to take accountability for the decision and resign in front of the people of South Africa?

Mmusi received a round of applause from the members of Parliament and, as they settled down, Zuma prepares to answer with the following (talk about dodging bullets):

Honourable Speaker I appointed Jonas as a deputy minister, that is what I offered Jonas. I never offered Jonas the ministry, that is why he is deputy minister.

If Jonas says he was offered by the Guptas, I think you will be well-placed to ask the Guptas or Jonas. Don’t ask me. Where do I come in? I have no business with that, absolutely no business.

Ask the people who are said by Jonas offered him… I am in charge of government, I appoint in terms of the Constitution. There is no minister here who was ever appointed by the Guptas, or by anybody else. Ministers who are here were appointed by me.

Yesterday morning, Maimane laid criminal charges against Zuma’s son Duduzane and the Gupta family over Jonas’s statement.

The next person to challenge Zuma by asking him about the firing of Nene was Inkatha Freedom Party MP Sibongile Nkomo. Zuma responded:

If a minister has to be shifted or deployed, there are reasons that lead to that. There is no action in terms of removal and replacing or appointing ministers that come without reasons why that is done. There were reasons why Minister Nene had to be redeployed.

Those reasons are the reasons of government, and once Nene was removed you needed to replace that and that is what I did, and this arises out of what government is doing and what the thinking and decisions of government are. If there can be any influence in how government does things it can only be the ruling party, that will not necessarily come to tell you do this and do that.

Before Nene left, the rand was on the down slope.

Secondly it is not the first time that the markets react when a minister is either put or taken away. There was a decision taken, very well considered on why we are taking Nene and where we are sending him to.

Maimane rose on a point of order, and was told off by Speaker Baleka Mbete for rising while Zuma was still on his feet. After Zuma said he had completed his answer, Maimane responded:

The president has come here to tell South Africans that the rand was already on the decline, which is not true.

This is when the entire DA caucus then rose to leave the chamber…more to follow.

[source: iol]